8,184 thoughts on “Greatest Warrior of All Time

  1. Guys,

    Lets see, who was the Most “Khunnasbaaz”(Revengeful) character of MB ??

    Q: Most “Khunnasbaaz”(Revengeful) character of MB ??

    My Top 6 list is:

    1. Drona
    2. Karna
    3. Ashwatthama
    4. Bhima
    5. Arjun
    6. Jarasandh
    —————————-

    Explainations:

    1. Drona :
    – Drona was the MOST Khunnasbaaz (Revengeful) character of MB….
    – He had Khunnas from Drupad for almost 30 years….
    Drupad ONLY rejected Drona’s INVALID demand to give him HALF the Kingdom… but Drona took it as a BIG INSULT & had so much Khunnas in his heart that he agreed to become SERVENT of Hastinapur in order to get their Backup & to train Kuru princes so that they can take the REVENGE on his behalf…..

    Now, points to note are :

    – Drupad DID NOT do any physical harm to Drupad…..
    – Drona did not forget about his REVENGE for almost 30 years…..
    – Drona being just a NON-CAPABLE ordinary person, still DARED to take revenge from a KING (Drupad)…..!!
    – Brahmin war teachers like Drona neve accepted Kshatriyas as their Student before, but for the SAKE OF HIS REVENGE, Drona accepted the Kuru princes as his students…..
    – Drona put the life of Kuru Princes on the line, to take his revenge….!! What if any of the kuru Prince had died in Gurudakshina war..??..!!
    – Now, to make the character of drona worse, Drona didnt even put his own life at risk to take his REVENGE from Drupad…..!!

    ———————–

    2. Karna :
    – The 2nd MOST Khunnasbaaz (Revengeful) character of MB….
    – He had Khunnas from Arjun for almost 50 years…..

    Points to note here are :
    – Arjun NEVER did any harm to Karna…. But just because Arjun was EXTRAORDINARILY talented & best in archery, so Karna stared having jeolousy & Khunnas for Arjun…..
    – Karna asked for Brahmastra from Drona, Only to fight/kill Arjun to prove himself better than Arjun ….
    – Karna always wanted to kill Arjun ONLY to prove himself better than Arjun…..
    – Even after Karna knew that Pandavas were his brothers, still he wanted to KILL ARJUN ONLY to prove himself better than Arjun…. What a KHUNNAS….!! (P.S.: Karna had whatsoever no care for Duryo’s cause, which is proved in this blog)

    – Karna also had Khunnas with Bhishma/Drona/Kripa…. Karna was so much Khunnas-baaz that he REFUSED to fight the MB war under Bhishma, not giving a damn about Duryo’s cause….!!

    ———————-

    3. Ashwatthama:
    – He had Khunnas with Panchals, because Dristdyumna killed Drona…..
    – Now, if Ashwatthma had killed Dristdyumna DURING MB war, then this would have been understandable, but Ashwatthma kept his Khunnas alive even after the MB war was over & cowardly attacked Pandavas’ camp at night to kill Panchals & sons of Draupadi…..
    – Ashwatthama had the Khunnas but NEVER had the guts to challenge/kill Panchals in an open fight…..

    ———————

    4. Bhima:
    – He had Khunnas with 100 kuru brothers & killed them all….
    – Although Bhima’s Khunnas had a VALID reason & that was Draupadi’s insult at Dyuta….. but still it takes a lot of Khunnas to kill your family members…..

    ——————–

    5. Arjun:
    – He had Khunnas with Jaydrath because of Arjun’s fatherly love for Abhimanyu…..
    – Arjun’s Khunnas gets one extra point because Arjun took a Super challenging Pledge to kill Jaydrath next day before sunset & that too when Jaydrath had the protection of WHOLE kuru army…..!! And to make matter worse, Arjun also pledge to take “Agni-Samadhi” if he fails in his Pledge….. Although, i would say that this was more of an ANGER thing for Arjun then the Khunnas…..
    – Arjun further carried on this Khunnas by killing Vrishsena in front of Karna….

    ——————-

    6. Jarasandh:
    – Jarasandh had Khunnas with Krishna because Krishna killed Kansa-the son-in-law of Jarasandh….
    – And for this Khunnas, Jarasandh captured Krishna’s Mathura & made Krishna run away from his own kingdom…..

    Like

  2. @ Dhakkan Sanjay,

    Your statement-“Bhishma pledged. Bhishma acknowledged his pledge. ACTUAL event of bhishma taking that pledge is not there. So you find contradiction here?”

    My ans- So you accepted that BHishma did not take this pledge(to help Duryo) at the time of his “Original Bhishma Pratigya” but he took it later…. Good ….. Case solved…. So the onus in on you to show the timing of this 2nd pledge….

    Further, this proves that Bhishma was not at all obligated to side with Kurus from the begining, but he started favouring Duryodhan LATER…. And as i have stated previously, Bhishma became Pro-Duryo after the Rajsuya Yagya of Pandavas… (may be Bhishma was felt insulted because Yudi became Samraat)…..

    Further, when Duryo stared forming the coalition of Kings by requesting other kings to join his side for MB war, then obiviously every king gives a Promise or takes a pledge that he would help Duryodhan in MB war…. Similarly Bhishma may have given this (2nd) pledge to Duryo to side with him in MB war, JUST BEFORE THE MB WAR…..

    So whatever may be the timing of this 2nd pledge, still it only proves that Bhishma took the side of Duryo ON HIS OWN WISH…..

    Your statement-“I failed to prove “Duryo’s acceptence to Bhishma’s condition” hence my point is punctured still Duryo fought without Karna till Bhishma was fighting proves my point.”

    My ans- Ha..ha…ha.. Duryo fought without Karna till Bhishma was fighting proves that it was Karna’s own decision to not to participate in war UNDER BHISHMA, because “Duryo’s acceptence to Bhishma’s condition” is not there….. Got it Mr Kindergarten Moron…

    Your statement-“You prove that Duryo DID NOT ACCEPT Bhishma’s condition till then you are a punctured dhol.”

    My ans- Ha..ha…ha.. I dont need to, because you accepted that-“I failed to prove “Duryo’s acceptence to Bhishma’s condition hence my point is punctured”……. Got it Mr Kindergarten Dhakkan…

    Your statement-“Hence point remains, that Karna did not participate in MB war ONLY because of Bhishma’s CONDITION”

    My ans- Punctured above….

    Your statement-“Abey Khaali bartan! You are in love with Karna’s EGO so that love should stay under Drona as well. Rather it should be even more intense since Drona did not give him brahmastra. Since it never happened your love for Karna’s EGO goes phussssss and proved adolescence infatuation of a STUPID teenager who has not grown fully…….!”

    My ans- Punctured Personal opinion of a Kindergarten Dhakkan……

    Your statement-“You should ask yourself and not Karna “Who would have got credit for victory if Karna had fought under Drona….??”

    My ans- NON-CONTEXTUAL question of an ILLITERATE Dhakkan…..

    Your statement-” Q.1: Why was it neccesary for Pandavas to kill Jarasandh for Rajsuya Yagya ?Ans: Because Krishna advised them to do so otherwise they could NEVER perform Rajsuya.”

    My ans- Well well well….. So you accepted that it was necessary for Pandavas to subjugate ALL KINGS of India(including Jarasandh & Karna) for Rajsuya Yagya….. Thanks…. I won ….

    Your statement-“What is the SIGNIFICANCE of Rajsuya Yagya ?? Why did Pandavas performed the Rajsuya Yagya ?Ans: To collect chandaaa (bheekh) for the yaga which happened over many days and hosted large population of Brahmins, rishis, kings etc. Pandavas were poor beggars who did not have that much money to host such large scale festivity…”

    My ans- Ha..ha…ha.. Ha..ha…ha.. Ha..ha…ha.. Ha..ha…ha.. Ha..ha…ha.. Ha..ha…ha.. Ha..ha…ha.. Ha..ha…ha.. Now, we are back with Kindergarten jokes of Kindergarten Dhakkan….. Begger becoming Samraat of India…?? Ha..ha…ha.. Ha..ha…ha.. Ha..ha…ha.. Ha..ha…ha.. Ha..ha…ha.. Ha..ha…ha..

    Like

  3. Sachin – Arey Dhakkan….. The point of ACTUAL event comes when there is contradiction in the “ACTUAL event” & “Statement of some character of MB”….. In case of “Krishna leaving Mathura and shifting to Dwarka”, there is no such CONTRADICTION… so keep you Idiocity upto you only….

    Sanjay – Bhishma pledged. Bhishma acknowledged his pledge. ACTUAL event of bhishma taking that pledge is not there. So you find contradiction here?
    Krishna left Mathura. Krishna acknowledged that. ACTUAL event of Krishna leaving Mathura is not there. BUT you don’t find contradiction here?

    Thanks for proving you are both – dhakkan as well as khaali bartan…!!
    ===========
    Sachin – And since you failed to show the actual event of Bhishma taking pledge to support Duryo in MB war, hence your claim is punctured…..

    Sanjay – Already showed you mirror above

    ============
    Sachin – Without Duryo’s acceptence, Bhishma’s condition is irrelevant… and since you failed to prove “Duryo’s acceptence to Bhishma’s condition”, hence you point is punctured…… Got it Mr Moron….

    Sanjay – I failed to prove “Duryo’s acceptence to Bhishma’s condition” hence my point is punctured still Duryo fought without Karna till Bhishma was fighting proves my point. Now Mr Moron! You prove that Duryo DID NOT ACCEPT Bhishma’s condition till then you are a punctured dhol.

    ==========

    Sachin – Hence point remains, that Karna did not participate in MB war ONLY because of his EGO…..

    Sanjay – Hence point remains, that Karna did not participate in MB war ONLY because of Bhishma’s CONDITION…..

    =============

    Sachin – Abey Chamann… Karna fought under Drona, so does it give an EXCUSE to Karna for not participating under Bhishma ??? MB clearly mentions the reason of EGO of Karna(of not giving credit of his success to Bhishma) as the actual reason of Karna not participating under Bhishma…

    Sachin – Abey Khaali bartan! You are in love with Karna’s EGO so that love should stay under Drona as well. Rather it should be even more intense since Drona did not give him brahmastra. Since it never happened your love for Karna’s EGO goes phussssss and proved adolescence infatuation of a STUPID teenager who has not grown fully…….!

    =========
    Sachin – And instead of asking me Stupid questions, you should ask your favourite Karna that “Why did he back-stab his best friend-Duryo on multiple occasions ??” & “Who would have got credit for victory if Karna had fought under Bhishma….?? Got the point you ILLITERATE Kindergarten Moron…..

    Sanjay – Obviously if you certify yourself STUPID by giving STUPID theories I will put STUPID questions only and see you are CHICKENING OUT of that even. You should ask yourself and not Karna “Who would have got credit for victory if Karna had fought under Drona….?? Got the point you ILLITERATE Moron…..

    ============
    Sachin – And speaking of Chickening out, you cowardly CHICKENED OUT of my previous questions(as usual):

    Sanjay – See you are again CHICKENING OUT by putting questions instead of answering my SIMPLE question.
    =============
    Your Q.1: Why was it neccesary for Pandavas to kill Jarasandh for Rajsuya Yagya ?
    Ans: Because Krishna advised them to do so otherwise they could NEVER perform Rajsuya. And they being mindless tattoos of Krishna and helpless calves obliged….
    ==============
    Q.2: What is the SIGNIFICANCE of Rajsuya Yagya ?? Why did Pandavas performed the Rajsuya Yagya ?

    Ans: To collect chandaaa (bheekh) for the yaga which happened over many days and hosted large population of Brahmins, rishis, kings etc. Pandavas were poor beggars who did not have that much money to host such large scale festivity….Khush…????
    ==========
    Sachin – So Mr ILLITERATE Chicken, first answer my questions, before doing your Kooook-dooo-koooon here….

    Sanjay – So Mr ILLITERATE Chicken, now answer MY question- Who would have got credit for victory if Karna would have fought under Drona’s leadership…..??? I can see ANOTHER CHICKENING OUT…..Poor ILLITERATE MORON!

    Like

Say it right

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s