The extracts mentioned here are from K M Ganguli translation of mahabharat
well me and my friend was discussing about this link
This is what is told in this link
Here is the flow of events … Duryodhan said: “As they are now our slaves, I command that they disrobe.” On hearing these words, the 5 Pandav brothers removed their uttariya (a long piece of cloth worn on the shoulders, like a shawl) and kept it aside. Draupadi, who was wearing only one robe (ekvastra) denied to discard it. Druyodhan ordered Dushasan to disrobe Draupadi. At this command, Dushasan gleefully tried to get hold of her robe. Surging with rage Bheem thundered, “I swear, I’ll kill you and drink your blood Dushasan!” It were these words from Bheem that stopped Dushasan from disrobing Draupadi, and hearing this trembling he sat on the floor. When Bheem killed Dushasan in the Great War, he asked “With which hand did you pull Draupadi by her hair?” He did not ask “With which hand did you pull Draupadi’s clothes?” It was Bheem’s rage, and his capability at doing what he uttered, that saved Draupadi, not Krishna’s divine intervention.
then they put some facts
after the game of dice when Draupadi met Krishna, she said: “Oh Hari! At that time nobody saved me. Neither these husbands were mine, nor these sons were mine. And you, even you were not mine!” Had Krushn saved her would she have uttered such words?
Draupadi said to krishna “Husbands, or sons, or
friends, or brothers, or father, have I none! Nor have I thee, O thou slayer of Madhu, for ye all, beholding me treated so cruelly by inferior
foes, sit still unmoved”
When the Pandav were in the forest, Krushn said to them “I was away. Had I known of this dice game, I would not have allowed it to happen.” This implies that he did not know of anything that happened in his absence. Then how could he have provided the clothes or else did he knowingly allow draupadi to be stripped?
“Vasudeva said, O lord of earth, if I had been present at Dwaraka, then, O king, this evil would not have befallen thee! And, O irrepressible one, coming unto the gambling-match, even if uninvited by the son of Amvika (Dhritarashtra), or Duryodhana, or by the other Kauravas, I would have prevented the game from taking place …… then I would have slain them all, along with those
gamblers, there present! ”
This site tells that krishna didn’t save draupadi by giving dress, this is not my point . but this website is one who is tellilng this point , so give your views. do tell your points with any proofs if they are available